What changes when liquidity improves.

Three mandates on companies with acutely impaired secondary-market liquidity: thin order books, persistent wide spreads, and minimal institutional participation. All outcomes verified against pre-mandate baseline.

The Problem SGX · Mainboard · Industrials

Spread at minimum only 75% of the time. Order book depth thin and unpredictable. Institutional funds unable to size positions without moving price. Stock ignored on screeners on quiet days.

What We Did
  • Deployed continuous two-sided algorithmic quotes during all trading hours.
  • Maintained 200k–500k shares on each side of the order book, 5× to 11× average trade size.
  • Provided volume floor on quiet sessions to prevent zero-trade days.
Results
95%Spread at 1-tick
98%Order book presence
+200%Volume uplift
The Problem SGX · Mainboard · Energy / Industrials

Wide spreads 25% of the time made the stock look volatile to institutional algorithms. Thin book depth meant even moderate sell orders caused sharp, non-fundamental price moves.

What We Did
  • Tightened spread to 1-tick 95% of the session, eliminating gap windows that triggered algo exclusion.
  • Built institutional-scale liquidity buffer of 1M–3.4M shares per side.
  • Provided consistent volume support validating price moves for technical analysts.
Results
~2.2MAvg depth per side
6.9MLargest clip absorbed
+25%Volume uplift
The Problem SGX · Catalyst · Industrials / Professional Services

Stock had days with zero trades, risking listing compliance breaches. With 80% free float but almost no market activity, it was invisible to screeners and structurally uninvestable for any institution.

What We Did
  • Became the primary market driver on quiet days, supplying ~70% of daily volume to eliminate zero-trade sessions.
  • Brought spread to 1-tick 95% of the time, up from 80%.
  • Maintained 80k–200k shares depth per side, qualifying for institutional ticket sizes 10× above prior flow.
Results
+300%Volume uplift
95%Spread at 1-tick
312KMax flow absorbed

All cases anonymised. Figures from live mandates, December 2025. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Results by segment

Improvement at every scale. The magnitude varies. The outcome does not.

The extent of improvement depends on starting market quality and company size. Smaller companies with the most acute structural deficiencies see the largest absolute gains. For larger companies where even single-digit improvements carry outsized strategic consequences, DeltaBlock's precision execution delivers measurable market quality gains at scale.

Improvement in market liquidity by market cap segment
Micro-cap
>100%
Small-cap
20–120%
Mid-cap
12–100%
Large-cap *
2–12%
* Note on large-cap mandates

For a company approaching MSCI, FTSE, or HSCI index inclusion thresholds, a 2–5% improvement in composite market quality can determine whether the stock is included or excluded. The downstream effect — forced passive fund allocation — can dwarf the cost of the mandate many times over.

General improvements across all mandates
−80%
Bid-ask spread reduction
−53%
Price impact reduction
−25%
Intraday volatility reduction
+100%
Increase in traded volume
100%
Market hours with daily quotes

Based on internal analytics across live SGX and HKEX mandates (2023–2025). Metrics are indicative and do not constitute a guarantee of future performance. Outcomes vary by issuer, starting liquidity profile, and prevailing market conditions.

Ready to see what your numbers could look like?

We analyse your stock's current market quality and model what a mandate would deliver, before any commercial conversation.

Typical response within one business day. Available for companies listed on SGX, HKEX, Euronext, and LSE.